SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (29320)5/30/2008 7:30:59 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
Obama distances himself from another clergyman By CARYN ROUSSEAU, Associated Press Writer
2 minutes ago

Whoops, another crazy racist friend. They probably understand Obambi has to pretend to disown them to fool whitey.

CHICAGO - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama said Thursday that he was "deeply disappointed" by a supporter's sermon at his church that mocked Hillary Rodham Clinton.


The Rev. Michael Pfleger, a Chicago activist, also apologized for last Sunday's sermon at Obama's church, in which he said Clinton's eyes welled with tears before the New Hampshire primary because she felt "entitled" to the Democratic nomination and because "there's a black man stealing my show."

In video circulating on the Internet, Pfleger said the former first lady expected to win the nomination before Obama's sudden popularity.

"She just always thought that, 'This is mine. I'm Bill's wife. I'm white.' ... And then, out of nowhere, came 'Hey, I'm Barack Obama." And she said, 'Oh damn, where did you come from? I'm white. I'm entitled. There's a black man stealing my show,'" Pfleger said at Trinity United Church of Christ.

He then went on to parody Clinton, sobbing and wiping his face with a handkerchief.

"She wasn't the only one crying," he said. "There was a whole lot of white people crying."

Obama won the Iowa caucuses, the first contest of the nominating season, in January. Days later, Clinton's eyes brimmed with tears and her voice broke as she talked with New Hampshire voters on the eve of the primary, which she won.

Obama said he was "deeply disappointed" by Pfleger's comments.

............

news.yahoo.com

media.nationalreview.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (29320)5/30/2008 3:22:43 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224748
 
OBAMA'S LAND OF LOSERS

ADAM BRODSKY, May 30, 2008

-- FOR all his soaring, hopeful rhetoric, Barack Obama chose an odd message this week to send Wesleyan's graduating seniors.
Face it, kids - he basically said - Americans are losers. Pathetic, needy dependents who can't make it without help. So forget your dreams, dear graduates. Go forth and aid your fellow deadbeats.

Never mind "The Audacity of Hope." Obama was trumpeting "The Ubiquity of Failure." "The Equality of Need." "The Endlessness of the Dole."

OK, I exaggerate - a little. Here are his actual words: "Our collective service can shape the destiny of this generation . . . Individual salvation depends on collective salvation."

That is, unless we come together and fix America's myriad flaws (like poverty, which never disappears), we're all doomed.

This went well past the standard graduation calls for community service and voluntarism. The senator chided those who seek life's material rewards: "Fulfilling your immediate wants and needs," he insisted, "betrays a poverty of ambition."

In fact, Obama himself was betraying a poverty of understanding US history.

After all, it's not too many Americans pursuing their dreams that threatens the nation's greatness - it's too few.

Obama's America has two groups: those in need - and those who care for them. Missing are the folks who produce real wealth - the goods and services all Americans enjoy.

Sure, helping others is a noble pursuit. And Obama's GOP rival, John McCain, certainly honors public service. But America's success owes much to its high regard for individualism - personal rights and responsibilities, and individual self-advancement. If Obama truly appreciated that, he might have challenged the students to dream big. And to pursue those dreams with gusto.

America didn't rise to great wealth and power because its population was steeped in social work, political agitation and collective care-giving.

Yes, a strong social fabric was vital to our national growth. But it was the competitive drive - the lure of money, fame, influence - that led to the automobile, mass production, wonder drugs, personal computers . . .

It was the individualist spirit - that drive to seek out one's destiny, even perhaps to the exclusion of all else - that spawned superstars in science, business, sports, the arts.

The highest achievers - the Bill Gateses and such - became unfathomably rich. But everyone benefited from their work.

Obama could have galvanized the grads, urging them to follow in the paths of these heroes - to take a job, say, with Big Oil and invent a cheaper way to make cars run. Instead, he ladled out soggy oatmeal.

But his speech was more than just recycled graduation clichés. Obama, who worked as a community organizer in his youth, was describing his world, his vision.

Yes, he's sometimes paid rhetorical homage to American capitalism, acknowledging that it has "led to a standard of living unmatched in history."

But his record betrays something else: He favors higher taxes, "fair trade" over "free trade," a higher minimum wage, bailouts for subprime "victims," penalties for "predatory lenders," bigger subsidies for health care and housing.

For Obama, such stands - and a communal spirit - offer "change" and "hope."

"All it takes is one act of service," he says, "one blow against injustice, to send forth what Robert Kennedy called that tiny ripple of hope."

But America is neither unjust nor bereft of hope. Far from it.

And if Barack Obama thinks the next generation of Americans needs to spend its time dwelling on this nation's "wrongs" and catering to the "underserved," he's got a sad vision for America indeed.

www.nypost.com