Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tyc:> who wrote (59803)	5/30/2008 4:22:08 PM
From: marcos	Respond to of 78434

They can use one year, or one week if they like, makes no difference to me, i see nine years two weeks and two days, plug that into my squint 'n guess model, and get 'More than 2.50 and probably less than 3.25' for net present value ... canadianwarrants.com is using the 9yrs2wks2days figure no doubt, getting 3.94 but that is unrealistic i think as it reduces leverage to near two, compared with holding the common ... think minimum leverage of about three in order, at this point and as the common moves up through about 12.00 or so ... just guessing really, don't know, and arguing against my book here because i still do have hope of a big dump in them, but also driven primarily by the ego strokes of getting the right call in ahead of time, and pretty convinced that's a good one long term Not a bad month, may08, not bad at all ... far superior to april anyway, so a decent trend ... have a good one guys, got to go, promised my daughter i'd play with her after the close ... cheers