Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rocket Red who wrote (116318)	5/30/2008 7:23:27 PM
From: Nostradameus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313561

CQM.H : IS it normal ?? any real substance or people crazy ???

To: Rocket Red who wrote (116318)	5/30/2008 7:41:48 PM
From: sageyrain	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 313561

"Based on some of the Canadian-based research on the play to date, he said the size of the resource is being estimated between 24 and 30 trillion cubic feet of natural gas. That compares favourably with the estimated 15 tcf being touted at another hot zone for natural gas, the Montney Shale in British Columbia." financialpost.com Let's say it is only 10 tcf. At U.S. $7.5 per mcf (thousand cubic feet) that is a gross insitu value of..... (10 trillion, I think that is 1 x 10^13? Divided by 1000 and then x 7.5, my calculator is smoking) .... US 75 billion gross value for the play. I know, still early, but you don't often get a ground floor shot at such potential very often. (if my math is right, lol)