SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (125337)5/31/2008 12:11:19 PM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 173976
 
One form of proof might be what access he had to information that was in fact lied about. He didn't (McClellan) as far as I can see provide any information that was lied about. He just simply said he believed they lied and he believed their were motives of Bush wanting to preserve a legacy. That was all conjecture on McClellan's part. Perhaps you should cite a fact that McClellan cited that was lied about.

I haven't read the book, much like you. I haven't seen any facts or heard them in interviews.



To: JBTFD who wrote (125337)5/31/2008 6:55:08 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Given that everything the Bush administration said in support of the war is identical to what the Clinton administration said, what the Clinton appointed CIA director said, and leading Democrats were saying, there simply isn't grounds for suggesting the Bush administration lied about anything. Unless every Clinton administration official was also lying.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News