SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dale Baker who wrote (70001)6/1/2008 2:32:37 PM
From: Sam  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541933
 
This looks like it could be an interesting series on water in the southwest. From the Salt Lake Tribune. Home of the remnants of what was once an enormous inland lake.

sltrib.com

Utah's water forecast: Thirsty times are a-brewin'
Water shortages ahead for Utah and the rest of the Southwest
By Patty Henetz
The Salt Lake Tribune
Salt Lake Tribune
Article Last Updated:05/31/2008 03:07:04 AM MDT

Maj. John Wesley Powell began his exploration of the Colorado River and Utah in 1869, and 10 years later his "Report on the Lands of the Arid Region of the United States, With a More Detailed Account of the Lands of Utah" cut straight to a fundamental truth.
The West lacks water, Powell wrote. "Disastrous droughts will be frequent," he said.
A better word than frequent, perhaps, could have been "persistent," or even "the natural way of climate in an arid region becoming more so even as millions arrive to take up residence." No matter - the warning was clear as the bluest Utah sky. Powell soon lost his job.
Nearly five years ago, after a little more than a year at the helm of the state Division of Water Rights, State Engineer Jerry Olds committed what some observers said looked like a similar career suicide. Olds told lawmakers Utah's groundwater was so over-allocated that if water rights weren't adjusted to reality, aquifers that are the state's primary water sources could be destroyed.
That riled ranchers, farmers and county officials who consider themselves the guardians of Utah's rural heritage and who thought Olds had fired on them. Today, they are working with Olds on a new task force whose ambitious vow in April was to reach consensus by October on a host of water puzzles that for 200 years have driven otherwise sane people to lunacy.
Like many of their Western neighbors, Utahns have been promised imaginary water.
There is no way all the "paper rights" on file with the state can be converted to "wet water." There is not even a requirement to tell the state when water rights sell or transfer, a routine matter with other properties, such as homes or cars. The state can't even tell if some crook is selling the same right repeatedly, a matter that would come to light when the fleeced tried to get state approval for use.
And when push comes to shove, the law of the West says ranchers and farmers with senior rights rule the outcome, even though Utah, like the rest of the West, grows more cities than crops.
Meanwhile, we blithely turn on the tap and water comes out.
But where does the water come from? How will it keep flowing? What's the best way to use it? Can we find more? Should we just move to Wisconsin?
Multiple scientific analyses - including this past week's report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture - predict global climate disruption and water shortages will land hard on the Southwest, Utah in particular.
After a wet winter, statewide spring runoff will hit about 120 percent of the past 100-year average.
But that's just weather, not climate. The waters of the Bear River basin will flow only about 58 percent of average and Bear Lake will be only about one-third full. Statewide, reservoirs may reach just 80 percent of capacity.
Lake Powell is expected to rise by 50 feet this spring, but National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration scientists calculate it would take 15 years of the past century's average precipitation to fill it. They say that's unlikely.
Scientists at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography at the University of California, San Diego, recently suggested Lake Powell and Lake Mead, the two largest storage reservoirs on the Colorado, have an even chance of being "dead pool" mud puddles in just 13 years.
Wildfires are burning earlier and longer, leaving charred soils exposed to erosion and less likely to revegetate. Water evaporates from exposed soils, killing the plants that hold it in place and destroying ecosystems fish and wildlife depend on.
Climate change means spring runoff in the West is expected to decline 30 percent by the end of the century, say U.S. Geological Survey researchers. By 2050, heat will so bake the soils that dust storms may rival the Dust Bowl disasters of the 1930s.
Wind-borne dust, that triggered a Utah Division of Air Quality red-alert health advisory in April, spread westward from Battle Mountain, Nev., to blanket the Wasatch Front. A proposal to tap the west desert to pipe water to Las Vegas would intensify those dust storms, critics say.
Blowing dust closed Interstate 15 multiple times last year. Dust is settling on Utah's snowcaps, including the Bear River headwaters in the Uintas, causing them to melt too soon, starving the river and Bear Lake. Dirty snow in the Wasatch Range threatens runoff that waters most of the state's residents. Glaciers that feed the Colorado River are disappearing as high-country temperatures rise.
It's dry, all right. Yet, Utah has the highest daily per capita use of water in the nation, mostly to drench lawns and landscapes.
Hydrologists and meteorologists are predicting this summer will be hotter than average. During last summer, Utah's hottest on record, Death Valley-like temperatures scorched Washington County, whose water district has proposed the $800 million pipeline from Lake Powell to feed regional growth that, opponents say, could mimic that of Los Angeles or Las Vegas.
The Colorado River has too little water to meet state allocation requirements forged nearly a century ago by the Colorado River Compact. And despite an interim agreement on how to share shortages, the seven states that depend on the river - California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming and Utah - know the current situation cannot endure.
About 35 million people now live in the Colorado River basin, which also includes northern Mexico and many Indian nations. The population may swell to 50 million by 2025.
Could Powell's 130-year-old warning sound any louder?
phenetz@sltrib.com

About the series

The Salt Lake Tribune launches a summerlong exploration of Utah's water challenges with an overall look at the issues the state faces. Other installments, beginning Sunday, will address:
Water rights: Utah has doled out more water rights than there is water available. Something has to give.
Water and growth: Southern Utah's growing pains include providing adequate water.
Water and politics: Two huge water projects may put Utah and Nevada on a collision course.
Water and the environment: A plan to dam the Bear River is moving ahead, but is it necessary?
Water and conservation: A success in Utah? The state has the highest per-capita consumption in the U.S.
A Western water assessment: The Colorado River provides 35 million people with water. With climate change, tough challenges lie ahead.

Sunday: A Green River farmer and a state engineer epitomize the water rights issue.
Stories this summer
Water and growth: Southern Utah's growing pains include providing adequate water.
Water and politics: Two huge water projects may put Utah and Nevada on a collision course.
Water and environment: A plan to dam the Bear River moves ahead, but is it necessary?
Water and nuclear power: Leasing a water right to a nuclear power plant.
Water and conservation: A success in Utah? The state has the second-highest per-capita consumption in the U.S.



To: Dale Baker who wrote (70001)6/1/2008 3:24:52 PM
From: Steve Lokness  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541933
 
Cult of Deception - Dowd on McClellan;


By MAUREEN DOWD
Published: June 1, 2008
WASHINGTON

» They say that every president gets the psychoanalyst he deserves. And every Hamlet gets his Rosencrantz.

So now comes Scott McClellan, once the most loyal of the Texas Bushies, to reveal “What Happened,” as the title of his book promises, to turn W. from a genial, humble, bipartisan good ol’ boy to a delusional, disconnected, arrogant, ideological flop.

Although his analytical skills are extremely limited, the former White House press secretary — Secret Service code name Matrix — takes a stab at illuminating Junior’s bumpy and improbable boomerang journey from family black sheep and famous screw-up back to family black sheep and famous screw-up.

How did W. start out wanting to restore honor and dignity to the White House and end up scraping all the honor and dignity off the White House?

It turns out that our president is a one-man refutation of Malcolm Gladwell’s best seller “Blink,” about the value of trusting your gut.

Every gut instinct he had was wildly off the mark and hideously damaging to all concerned.

It seems that if you trust your gut without ever feeding your gut any facts or news or contrary opinions, if you keep your gut on a steady diet of grandiosity, ignorance, sycophants, and peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, those snap decisions can be ruinous.

We already know What Happened, but it feels good to hear Scott say it. His conscience was spurred by hurt feelings.

In Washington, it is rarely the geopolitical or human consequences that cause people to turn on leaders behaving immorally. The town is far more narcissistic and practical than that.

The people who should be sounding the alarm for democracy’s sake, and the sake of all the young Americans losing lives and limbs, get truly outraged only when they are played for fools and fall guys, when their own reputations are at stake.

It was not the fake casus belli that made Colin Powell’s blood boil. What really got Powell disgusted was that W. and Dick Cheney used him, tapping into his credibility to sell their trumped-up war; that George Tenet failed to help him scrub his U.N. speech of all Cheney’s garbage; and that W. showed him the door so the more malleable Condi could have his job.

Tenet was privately worried about a war buildup not backed up by C.I.A. facts, but he only publicly sounded the alarm years later in a lucrative memoir fueled by payback, after Condi and Cheney tried to cast him as the fall guy on W.M.D.

McClellan did not realize the value of a favorite maxim — “The truth shall set you free” — until he was hung out to dry by his bosses in the Valerie Plame affair, repeating the lies Karl Rove and Scooter Libby brazenly told him about not being the leakers.

“Clearly,” McClellan says, sounding like the breast-heaving heroine of a Victorian romance, “I had allowed myself to be deceived.” He felt “something fall out of me into the abyss.”

And that was even before “the breaking point,” when he learned the worst about his idol — that the president who had denounced leaks about his warrantless surveillance program, who had promised to fire anyone leaking classified information about Plame, was himself the one who authorized Dick Cheney to let Scooter leak part of the top-secret National Intelligence Estimate.

“Yeah, I did,” Mr. Bush told his sap of a press secretary on Air Force One. His tone, the stunned McClellan said, was “as if discussing something no more important than a baseball score.”

He recalled the first time that he had begun to suspect that W. might be just another dissembling pol: when he overheard his boss, during his 2000 bid, ludicrously telling a supporter that he couldn’t remember, from his wild partying days, if he had tried cocaine.

“He isn’t the kind of person to flat-out lie,” McClellan said, but added, “I was witnessing Bush convincing himself to believe something that probably was not true.” He’d see a lot more of it over the next six years before Bush tearfully booted him out.

W.’s dwindling cadre hit back hard. In Stockholm, Condi — labeled “sometimes too accommodating” by the author — scoffed: “The president was very clear about the reasons for going to war.”

She’s right. He was very clear about it being because of W.M.D. Then he was very clear about it being to rid the world of a tyrant. Then he was very clear about it being to spread democracy. When that didn’t work out, he was very clear about it being that we can’t leave because we can’t leave.

He was always wrong, but always very clear.

Nicholas D. Kristof is off today.



nytimes.com