Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (387866)	6/2/2008 9:19:29 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574854

Removal of a dangerous dictator in a strategic part of the world. The fact that a free Iraq will increase oil exports (and has over the past year) is a side benefit. You don't know that... a likely outcome when we withdraw the majority of our troops is that the Iraqi government will be tied at the hip with Iran. Together they will control just slightly less oil reserves than Saudi Arabia. Even the passive Jimmy Carter produced the Carter doctrine that said the free flow of oil from the Persian Gulf is a vital interest of the US which we'd fight about. Now superseded by the Bush preemptive doctrine.... The oil market is free. Its just that many of the big players - Nocs - don't act like normal profit seeking market operators. That makes supplies tighter than they would be if profit seeking companies were able to operate in SA, Russia, Mexico, VZ, Iran, Kuwait, Iraq, etc. That sounds to me like a contradiction... you say the "oil market is free" and then go on to explain why it isn't.