Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (70315)	6/2/2008 9:37:41 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 543106

I do not lay traps So I can assume you thought Farrakhan had issued the sole endorsement to Obama that he had to back out of? That seems to be the implication of the message you sent me, which I have pasted below, along with my response. I mentioned three others that Obama had to publicly disavow. You know, it's really not that much fun to debate over here because everything I say is either challenged or taken as a personal attack, as you just did. I don't see anything wrong with laying traps, which I indicated when I said I don't blame you for doing it. I really don't understand why you say that's uncalled for. You wrote: To: ManyMoose who wrote (69927) 6/1/2008 3:20:15 PM From: Cogito Read Replies (1) of 70329 >>I don't understand how a fellow can have so many endorsements that he has to reject because of who is issuing them. << MM - You mean the one endorsement from Farrakhan? Is that one the "so many"? - Allen Message 24638287 om/2c5h9 I responded: To: Cogito who wrote (70009) 6/1/2008 4:06:43 PM From: ManyMoose Read Replies (1) of 70328 the one endorsement from Farrakhan? Nope. Closer than that. Pfleger, Wright, and lurkers of that sort. And there's always Hamas. These jokers don't realize they are hurting Obama every time they open up their mouths. But that's a good thing, because then we get to wonder why they support him. I'm really not interested in debating this. Message 24638379