SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: spiral3 who wrote (70468)6/3/2008 2:30:20 PM
From: spiral3  Respond to of 542946
 
Candidates Meet the Press: Who Gets the Toughest Coverage?
By CQ Staff

New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and some of her supporters have said during the campaign that Illinois Sen. Barack Obama has received far gentler treatment from the press than she has, and two different studies out today give differing perspectives on how strong that case is.

While a Gallup poll conducted May 19-20 finds that while most voters think coverage of Clinton, Obama and Arizona Sen. John McCain is about right, 30 percent said the media has been too hard on Clinton, a significantly higher figure than the other two.

But a joint study by Pew’s Project for Excellence in Journalism and Harvard’s Joan Shorenstein Center concludes that Obama and Clinton have fared about equally - and that Clinton’s own tactic of alleging differences in their coverage may have been a factor.

Rest of it and analysis of poll results here: cqpolitics.com



To: spiral3 who wrote (70468)6/3/2008 3:48:02 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542946
 
they can be legitimate when a character critique is directly or indirect ly related to the point being articulated.

Either his differentiation is way too arcane for me or that's baloney. (Criticism intended.)