Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (125700)	6/3/2008 4:25:58 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

LOL I can't believe you said that, but you ave answered your own question. <g> "It's pretty simple logic but maybe willfully not comprehensible to one who desires to make unsubstantiated assertions as if they were proven facts."

To: JBTFD who wrote (125700)	6/3/2008 5:22:57 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 173976

The question of whether a crime h/b committed is a legal issue. But lets talk about the publicizing of Plame's employment: Who is it that made it public knowledge? Novak. Where did he get that info? Armitage. Are they guilty of committing a crime iyo? If so, why weren't they prosecuted?

To: JBTFD who wrote (125700)	6/3/2008 8:41:53 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

Mark, on any issue, it is impossible to prove a crime WASN'T committed. For example, I can't prove you didn't commit a crime on your computer five minutes ago. Or ten minutes ago. Or 30 minutes ago. Impossible for me to know or prove. What's possible is law enforcement proving that a crime WAS committed. In the present case, they proved that Libby committed perjury. But law enforcement could not prove any violation of the Identities Act had occurred. Law enforcement knew the facts and concluded that they couldn't prove a crime on that.