SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (388356)6/4/2008 1:12:48 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1574261
 
Like Smirk, he could have opted for choices that would have never placed himself in the line of fire. As the son of an admiral, he could have had a billet that put him in the sights of cameras and not the enemy. He chose not to take that option. Like Gore, he made the more dangerous choice.

So I can understand, are you saying that as a National Guardsman Bush could not have been placed in the line of fire? It is my recollection that some Guardsmen -- though a small number, did serve in Vietnam.

Further, joining the Guard was making a military commitment, even though it might keep someone out of Vietnam -- it is far more, for example, than Obama has done. Perhaps we can read Bush's mind concerning whether he was attempting to avoid service in Vietnam or whether he was choosing to serve in a different, yet totally legitimate manner.

To suggest that Gore's service is somehow superior to Bush's is really not an appropriate comparison. Both served, honorably, and should be respected for their service. While I find a lot of fault with Al Gore, he wore the uniform and nobody can take that away from him. Or from George Bush.



To: combjelly who wrote (388356)6/4/2008 7:05:34 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574261
 
Bottom line, McCain could have stayed stateside, snorted coke and chased women like Smirk. He chose not to. For that, he has my respect.

I understand what you're saying but it strikes me that our expectations may be set too low.



To: combjelly who wrote (388356)6/4/2008 8:47:21 PM
From: michael97123  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574261
 
Actually this is a very good post. I defended Kerry four years ago from the smears and although i didnt vote for him, i refused then and now to demonize the guy who went when i avoided it and survived it. Same for all those guys who were drafted or enlisted. I like Tejek was lucky. I won the lottery. Ted can attack mccain all he wants for his service--its more a reflection of teds true self than that of mccain.