Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (21842)	6/5/2008 12:04:32 AM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Please quote ANY reputable climate scientist who agrees with you that atmospheric CO2 CANNOT have any warming effect on the planet. You think Lindzen agrees with you? LOL! I can't think of any who do. All the even quasi reputable climate scientists are well aware that GHG's are real, and that CO2 does have a significant impact. They differ on whether they think we should do anything about it (for ideological or economic reasons) or they might think there is some other negative feedback, as yet unknown, that will kick in and stabilize things (I'd called such people Gaians although they would be shocked to be called that) or they think it is good that we are warming things up. None are as pig stupid as you, and claim there is no effect of CO2 just because it is ppm and the atmosphere has lots of water vapor in it. For that level of stupidity you need to read Junkscience.com (I'm not sure even Malloy is actually that stupid, but it would not surprise me if he makes hints to that effect so his gullible readers can mislead themselves and feel happy like you do.) So who supports your nonsense? Give us a few names.