Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (388545)	6/4/2008 5:07:18 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573535

"Lots of things were argued one way or the other in the Federalist that are not quite the same today. " "The Federalist Papers" are where you go when you want to know the intent of the framers of the Constitution. It is fair to say that no one, not even Hamilton who wanted a stronger presidency than actually got written in, envisioned the president as having "near absolute control" over anything. "However, if you doubt that presidents run foreign policy, you need only look at the Iraq War, which apparently, has been largely opposed by the Left for the last couple years. " That is because the Senate has failed in their constitutional obligations. And that is why I oppose the same party controlling both houses and the presidency. Not that seems to make a difference to anyone else.