Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (88)	6/5/2008 1:31:31 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3816

Do you think it is time to start rationing food in America? ================== JOSH GERSTEIN NY Sun Monday, April 21, 2008 MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. — Many parts of America, long considered the breadbasket of the world, are now confronting a once unthinkable phenomenon: food rationing. Major retailers in New York, in areas of New England, and on the West Coast are limiting purchases of flour, rice, and cooking oil as demand outstrips supply. There are also anecdotal reports that some consumers are hoarding grain stocks. At a Costco Warehouse in Mountain View, Calif., yesterday, shoppers grew frustrated and occasionally uttered expletives as they searched in vain for the large sacks of rice they usually buy. “Where’s the rice?” an engineer from Palo Alto, Calif., Yajun Liu, said. “You should be able to buy something like rice. This is ridiculous.” The bustling store in the heart of Silicon Valley usually sells four or five varieties of rice to a clientele largely of Asian immigrants, but only about half a pallet of Indian-grown Basmati rice was left in stock. A 20-pound bag was selling for $15.99. “You can’t eat this every day. It’s too heavy,” a health care executive from Palo Alto, Sharad Patel, grumbled as his son loaded two sacks of the Basmati into a shopping cart. “We only need one bag but I’m getting two in case a neighbor or a friend needs it,” the elder man said. The Patels seemed headed for disappointment, as most Costco members were being allowed to buy only one bag. Moments earlier, a clerk dropped two sacks back on the stack after taking them from another customer who tried to exceed the one-bag cap.

To: tonto who wrote (88)	6/6/2008 3:36:39 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3816

"The Republicans take the women's vote very seriously and the Democrats take it for granted," Bonk said. ======================= Mourning but determined, feminists eye economy Fri Jun 6, 2008 NEW YORK (Reuters) - Feminists are as determined as ever to put "women's issues" at the center of the U.S. election campaign this year despite Hillary Clinton's exit. And by that they mean the economy. "Whoever wins the presidency in November, it will be because they were able to appeal to women voters," Kim Gandy of the national Organization for Women said at a conference of the National Council for Research on Women in New York this week. The New York senator will withdraw from the Democratic race on Saturday, leaving Barack Obama to face Republican John McCain in November's presidential election. With Clinton out of the picture, the focus at the meeting on Friday was how to influence the election debate. Sandra Morgen, a professor at Penn State University, said the women's movement had not focused enough on the economy. "We are not going to have a progressive agenda unless the needs of low income women are at the center," she said. National Council President Linda Basch said 14 million American women were living in poverty and, while 48 percent of the workforce are women, 61 percent of minimum wage jobs are held by women. She said the housing crisis is having a disproportionate effect on women, who were 32 percent likelier than men to have sub-prime mortgages and more likely to file for bankruptcy. Blue-collar workers, people earning less then $30,000 to $40,000 a year who voted overwhelmingly for Clinton in the primaries, will be the key to success in November, Gandy said. "They don't particularly have party loyalties, they're going to go to the candidate that speaks to the issues that they care about," she said. "Those demographic groups voted state after state after state for Hillary Clinton." "This is a group that is hurting desperately, and women are hurting disproportionately within that group," she said. Kathy Bonk, director of the Communications Consortium Media Center, said Democrats had tended not to invest enough time and energy in wooing women. She said it would be important for Obama to make sure his strong grassroots network pays enough attention to the women who voted for Clinton in the primary. "The Republicans take the women's vote very seriously and the Democrats take it for granted," Bonk said. Some of the women academics and activists at the annual gathering were in a somber mood after Clinton's loss. There was also tension. One questioner at the opening session on Thursday asked why the mood was so negative when an African American was in a position to win the White House for the first time. But Gandy said if the situation was reversed, people wouldn't be telling Obama's supporters to "just get over it." "A lot of our constituencies worked their hearts out for Hillary Clinton, and they are sad," she said. "They're going to do the right thing ... they're going to vote for the candidate who stands up for women's issues ... but they're mourning right now," she said. "It's only been a couple of days." Bonk said it was time to move beyond the personalities to focus on the issues, especially the economy, from child care to paid sick leave, minimum wage and health care. "Whether you are on the disappointed side or you're elated ... or if you prefer McCain ... we all need to come together to think about framing the issues for this election," she said. "The last two election cycles, the only issue that really relates back to women is abortion. We've got a responsibility to broaden that agenda." (Editing by Doina Chiacu)