SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Clarke who wrote (253136)6/5/2008 6:35:07 AM
From: Tom Clarke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793801
 
Did Rezko go straight to jail because he doesn't feel safe on the outside?

June 5, 2008

BY MARK BROWN Sun-Times Columnist

Everything about the jury verdict in the Tony Rezko trial went pretty much as one might have predicted Wednesday, except for what happened right afterward.

Rezko voluntarily surrendered to federal authorities.

Rather than ask U.S. District Court Judge Amy St. Eve to remain free on bond while he awaits sentencing, as is customary in federal court here, Rezko opted to go directly to jail.

He did not pass go. He did not collect 200 excuses as to why he shouldn't have to start serving his sentence.

Heck, he didn't even wait for his sentence.

Even St. Eve seemed to raise her eyebrows just a twitch as Rezko's lawyer, Joseph Duffy, announced to the court, "It's Mr. Rezko's intention to start serving his sentence immediately," in the process saving her from having to make the decision.

That is a very unusual development.

So what are we to make of it?

That's the question a lot of people in Rezko's possible line of fire -- from Rod Blagojevich to Bill Cellini to persons unknown in the Bush White House and to, yes, maybe even Barack Obama -- must be asking themselves today. Those are among the people with potentially the most to lose if Rezko should decide he wants to lighten his load by telling tales to federal authorities.

I take this as a sign, however, that he's not to that point just yet.

Duffy didn't offer any explanation, except to say Rezko decided it "on his own."

That leaves us to speculate.

The simplest answer is that Rezko may have felt St. Eve was going to revoke his bond anyway and order that he be detained. Federal prosecutors were asking her to do so when Duffy announced his intentions.
Could he be in danger outside?

This way Rezko can maintain some semblance that he is accepting responsibility for his crimes, even as he continues to maintain his innocence through Duffy. That can help during sentencing.

It also just may be that Rezko is tired of fighting. He has spent a lot of money -- and emotional energy -- to go to trial, and in the end, it didn't get him very far.

The tactic of attacking star government witness Stuart Levine only worked to a point. As jurors made clear, they found enough corroboration from secret government wiretaps and other evidence to make Levine's sometimes doubtful testimony hold up -- at least well enough to get convictions on 16 of 24 counts.

That still leaves Rezko looking at a minimum 10 years in prison before he even goes to trial on a second indictment he is facing.

There's a more interesting way to look at this, which paints a scenario you'd more likely see in a trial where there is some sort of mob connection.

Tony Rezko is a guy who knows a lot about a lot of people. Those people have a very serious stake in him keeping his mouth shut. Rezko is also known to be a very security-conscious guy.

I know this is going to sound overly dramatic, but it's not really that far-fetched to think Rezko may well believe he's in danger if he goes free and that by reporting to jail it's proof that he's not cooperating.

It's one way of saying, "You don't have to worry about me."

Serving time at the Metropolitan Correctional Center is not light duty, as Rezko already knows.
Poignant goodbye

I don't see this as a sign that Rezko has already thrown in the towel and decided to cooperate, not to say that he won't in the future as the prospect of the second trial looms even larger.

Among the people who weren't surprised by Rezko's decision to surrender were members of his family. They didn't make a peep when Duffy said the family patriarch wouldn't be going home with them. Clearly, he had shared his plans before coming to court Wednesday.

Just the same, there was a poignant scene after the jury returned its guilty verdicts. There was a pause in the proceedings as St. Eve went to thank the jurors outside the courtroom. During that time, Rezko was allowed to huddle with his two sons on the front bench in the courtroom.

Rezko's boys are high school to college age. They sat on either side of him and leaned in close to talk. He leaned over to speak directly into their ears, a scene not unlike the one you can see on YouTube of the soft-spoken Rezko imparting some comment to Blagojevich.

When court was adjourned, and it was time for Rezko to be led away, he turned to his family and gave a small wave. They gave a big wave back to him. As he reached the door to leave the courtroom, he hesitated and looked back at them once more.

It may sound cruel, but at some point, Rezko is going to have to decide if he wants to see them again outside a courtroom or a prison visitors' room, and when that day comes, he still has some cards to play.

suntimes.com



To: Tom Clarke who wrote (253136)6/5/2008 4:49:28 PM
From: Glenn Petersen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793801
 
Blagojevich's key aide Chris Kelly awaits trial. So does former Alderman and former Cook County Democratic Chairman Ed Vyrdolak.

"Fast Eddie" Vrdolyak switched parties over 20 years ago. He has been a Republican since 1987.

The big loser yesterday was Blagojevich. It will be a joyous day in Illinois when he is indicted.

Rezko played on both sides of the fence. Illinois is a cesspool.

Rezko is not just Obama's problem—he's the GOP's

By John Kass

June 5, 2008

Will Sen. Barack Obama declare that, if elected president, he would not pardon his fundraiser and personal real estate fairy, Tony Rezko, who was convicted Wednesday of multiple corruption charges in a Chicago federal court?

Obama is Mr. Reform, isn't he? And that's a legitimate question, isn't it?

The National Republican Party is making a big deal out of Rezko, with a snazzy new Barack-Rezko video, questioning Obama's judgment for buying that $1.6 million dream house, with the Rezkos purchasing the lot next door on the very same day in what looked like an old-fashioned back-scratching.

"On the day Barack Obama hoped to unite his party after wheezing over the finish line and claiming the Democratic nomination, a jury in his hometown of Chicago convicted his longtime friend and fundraiser Tony Rezko of multiple felonies," said Republican National Committee Chairman Robert M. "Mike" Duncan.

"This is further proof that Obama's high-flying rhetoric is just that, and in no way represents the kind of change our nation demands."

As most adults know but pretend otherwise, Obama is backed by the Daleys of Chicago, yet he's run a personality-cult campaign tied to the idea that he's the archangel of political reform. The national story line has been all about Camelot and Obama as the boy king, knighted by Ted Kennedy, a story too full of mist to be believed except by children. Yet finally, with the Rezko verdict, the focus is on the real Chicago, not the fairy tale.

But even as the Republican National Committee uses Rezko to thwack Obama, the RNC has a Rezko problem of its own. And they forgot to mention it on Wednesday.

It's a big Rezko problem. A big fat one known as Big Bob Kjellander and Big Bill Cellini.

That's at least 500 pounds of angry Republican boss hog, being pestered by the idea that Rezko could cut a deal and talk not only of Democrats but Republicans, too. Republicans like them, I mean.

Obama's opponent in the general election, Republican Sen. John McCain, can at least say that Kjellander and Cellini were supporters of Mitt Romney. While campaigning in Illinois, Romney made it clear that he'd get rid of U.S. Atty. Patrick Fitzgerald, who authorized the prosecution of Rezko.

Kjellander, the former treasurer of the RNC, is currently helping plan the 2008 Republican anti-Barack convention in Minnesota. He was mentioned prominently in the Rezko corruption trial.

In trial documents, Rezko friend Kjellander is called, somewhat poetically, "Individual K." He made millions in finder's fees on state bond deals with Democratic Gov. Rod "The Unreformer" Blagojevich.

Now Kjellander is putting the chocolate mints on John McCain's pillow at the Republican Convention.

Kjellander's political boss is Illinois Republican power broker, asphalt king and casino magnate William Cellini, another featured player in the court papers and in the trial.

Though neither Kjellander nor Cellini was charged in this case, both have been implicated. Cellini was named "Co-schemer A" by prosecutors and called "The Pope" by insiders manipulating billions of dollars in state pension fund investments.

It's like a Bridge to Nowhere without the ironworkers.

The White House Rasputin, Karl "The Architect" Rove, also was mentioned in the trial, as was former House Speaker Dennis "Don't Ask Me About My Land Deal" Hastert, alleged to have been part of an effort by the bipartisan Illinois Combine to get rid of Fitzgerald. To demonstrate their kinship, Cellini and Rezko flew out to Washington on a play date and visited a White House reception with President Bush, where Kjellander joined them.

Later in the Rezko trial, two witnesses said that Rezko told them not to worry about the criminal investigation, because the Republicans—Rove and Kjellander—would get rid of Fitzgerald. Hastert would install a friendly federal puppy who wouldn't bother the Combine, according to the testimony. "The federal prosecutor will no longer be the same federal prosecutor," testified Elie Maloof, a Rezko associate who is now a cooperating witness.

And a state pension board lawyer who has already pleaded guilty told grand jurors that Cellini told him "Bob Kjellander's job is to take care of the U.S. attorney."

The Illinois Republican Party holds its own convention this week in Decatur. The party establishment, which has long been cozy with the Daley Democrats at City Hall, has done little or nothing to rid the Illinois GOP of Kjellander and Cellini influence.

"If I owe a response [about the putsch to remove him from his job], I owe it to Congress, first," Fitzgerald said when asked about all this after the verdict.

Obama owes us a response, too, about whether or not he'd pardon his real estate fairy. But while we wait for answers, let's not forget that Republicans are just as much a part of the Rezko story as are the Democrats.

jskass@tribune.com

Copyright © 2008, Chicago Tribune

chicagotribune.com