Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: neolib who wrote (21858)	6/6/2008 11:51:04 AM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

dear lying neolib, where is the paper that speculates CO2 in the atmosphere accounts for about 30W/m2 and defines the meaningless nonsense of your statement. If you read retarded.realclimate.org posting the effects of CO2 is about how CO2 works if there is no H20. That is one stupidity I find so many idiots never figure out. overlap or competition for energy is ignored and h20 is given a synthetic definition of 60 W/m^2 and CO2 is 32 W/m^2 J. T. Kiehl and Kevin E. Trenberth applying that number with blind ignorance is the stupidity of the AGW crisis babblers. One cannot measure the 30 or 32 W/m2 because it is an imaginary definition as CO2 does not exist in an Earth Atmosphere that contains no H20. The science ignoramus cannot read Earth’s Annual Global Mean Energy Budget J. T. Kiehl and Kevin E. Trenberth toms.homeip.net and comprehend how it is quite misleading construct. It's clear J. T. Kiehl and Kevin E. Trenberth are not engineers. It is a great article however in giving those who have no real understanding of science to ride about quite naked.