Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (389117)	6/6/2008 9:46:49 AM
From: Road Walker	Respond to of 1574313

I dont want to give bush credit for this but i think you are. If iraq was a recruitment vehicle for them it failed and if there are only 200 or so holed up in SWahiristan lets go get them. I give Bush partial credit (though most of these plans were drawn up in previous admins). The actions to cut their money supplies, the actions to drive them out of Afghanistan (though it could have been done better), (probably most of) the covert actions were all positive. That's the stuff that you do to combat terrorism, as well as implementing some defensive actions. Iraq did and continues to recruit new Islamic radicals that may or may not become terrorists... just as a Muslim occupation of the US would sort of piss us off. But they are not part of the "core" of Al Qaeda. And Iraq is by far the bulk of Bush's "war on terrorism".