Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (21885)	6/6/2008 4:38:51 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

Try again Watson. If the cone you are pointing at magically changes by 30W/m2, what is your $10 brain expecting your $60 tool to show as a temp change? You are the idiot who has been implying that since you see -57 deg (or whatever) in clear sky, and +whatever for a cloud, therefore CO2 can't be having any affect. What a nutcase statement. At a loss of 10 W/m^2, in a year the column looses 3.16 x 10^8 J/m^2. Dividing this loss by the heat capacity yields a temperature decrease of 30 K. Another totally idiot statement. What would heat loss per year have to due with anything?