Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (272)	6/7/2008 2:48:23 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3816

Do you have any evidence that the bank violated any licensing requirements in offering the guns? Seems to me you are offended by the notion of a business offering guns as a promotion to customers and are reaching for arguments as to why that should be against the law. I'm not arguing the meaning of the second amendment here. It's a simple matter. The guns they were offering are legally sold items. As long as the bank complied with licensing and other applicable laws, there is nothing to complain about. As for your only militia members are entitled to own guns argument, that's a much bigger discussion, but I don't think you have a leg to stand on there either.