Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (21900)	6/7/2008 12:04:09 PM
From: neolib	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36917

If I had any interest in how long it takes to cool an isolated column of air I would have clearly asked that. I don't have any interest in that because it is not a relevant question. Lets return to the relevant question. What is the difference in temp as reported by your $60 meter when aimed at a clear, dry, sky, if you could test two times: 1) with "normal" atmosphere, and 2) with 30W/m^2 more radiation loss to space, i.e. the claimed blocking effect of CO2 removed? How many times have I asked Watson the Weasel to answer this, and Watson the Weasel has ducked the question? Try to be a man here Watson not a Weasel. You are the one who thought your $60 meter pointed at the sky told you something, specifically that CO2 couldn't be affecting anything, so please fill in the details as to why your meter can assure you of this.