Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (253021)	6/8/2008 12:24:27 AM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 275872

Intel's non-conus operations have been getting convicted and fined left and right due to the evidence. Dan, Intel has not been convicted of anything by anyone although it's fun to pretend. It isn't any more true that your other nonsense. I would add that no body has ruled against Intel after Intel has presented their side of the story. If that changes it will be up to a court to decide who's right, not an administrative body. That hasn't happened yet. I don't think it's a question of if Intel's going end up paying AMD some money in a couple of years, it's a question of how much money. I know you think that, but you also think Intel's been convicted and bribes customers. Oh and there's that nonsense claim of yours that Intel forced companies to drop AMD products. Anybody can make up nonsense claims when they have no evidence to back them up. That describes you. You have no evidence, just a big mouth.