SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rzborusa who wrote (253102)6/9/2008 8:07:36 PM
From: Elmer PhudRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
You guys just have too much imagination. You are reading evil intent into everything. How do you know we weren't speaking literally? I was and I assumed he was too. Apparently you actually believe someone from Intel payed cash to some company officials to stop using AMD products. Is that right? And what evidence do you have to support that? Nothing, but you still believe it because you need to believe it. The alternative is just too unbearable. AMD failed all on their own.



To: rzborusa who wrote (253102)6/10/2008 1:29:55 PM
From: TenchusatsuRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Borusa, > You made up the sack metaphor in the first place.

Only to illustrate the absurdity of maS' original argument:

Message 24657098

> AMD isn't asking for Intel advertising money just the right to sell to OEMs without financial bribes stopping them.

Oooooh, bribes. I guess any exclusionary contract is a "bribe" then. But only if a "monopoly" does it, jajajajajaja

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News