Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (390457)	6/11/2008 11:48:27 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574098

It really doesn't matter -- it is totally beside the point, which was the our presence in SA had little to do with bin Laden's 9/11 attack. I guess you only take him at face value when he threatens terrorist attacks. If they could provide their own security (i.e., protection from Iran), then I would be pleased for us to leave. But there has to be a withdrawal that makes sense in the way it protects Iraq from Iran (and others) in the process. What, we adopted these wimps for life? In this connection, I will tell you I do have some discomfort with the negotiations that are now underway between Iraq and Iran in regard to America's continued presence. But I don't think the facts are out on this yet, so we'll have to wait and see. Sorry for your 'discomfort'. Gastric or muscular?