Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (71660)	6/11/2008 7:17:50 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 542147

Steve, I hope you enjoy $5.00 gasoline and a falling dollar due to BOP issues. The train wreck you want (higher gasoline to force people to conserve) is coming! I hope this is a huge issue in the campaign.

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (71660)	6/11/2008 7:28:57 PM
From: Bridge Player	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542147

Nonsense, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (71660)	6/11/2008 11:36:51 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 542147

I'll put my familiarity with wild places up against yours any day, if you're going to get personal. I understood that to be against the protocol here. For the record, I do not approve of trashing wild places, especially wilderness areas where value has been established in law. I've left a lot of footprints in wilderness areas, so I know their value. I've also left a lot of footprints on land that clearly holds more value for other purposes, and I did my best to get the best out of that land too, by growing wood so you could build a house. If 2000 acres in ANWR has more value for oil so you can drive your SUV, it's not going to hurt the wildlife habitat in the remaining 19,000,000 acres.