Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Lokness who wrote (71923)	6/12/2008 10:39:11 PM
From: ManyMoose	Respond to of 542169

I'll check with my buddy. He will know, because he manages the habitat along the salmon streams he fishes. Second growth mono aged industrial forest are wildlife wastelands That might happen when the land use objectives do not include wildlife habitat, but when wildlife objectives are factored in to the prescription it is not inevitable, nor even likely. The land owners and their management plans determine which objectives are appropriate. On public lands, that includes wildlife. Maintenance of escape cover and travel corridors are important. Our standards were for a 60/40 ratio. Industrial lands do not necessarily have wildlife objectives, although some do.