SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (71944)6/13/2008 9:22:27 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 542812
 
The question is at what point does that negative emotion become a chronic or debilitating or environmentally non-constructive problem. Assessing the nearness of that point may be easier for someone not caught up in it than for someone who is not only caught up in it but shares it with a reinforcing group.

So whenever I see you making a post that I believe is too groupthink and emotional, I can undercut your arguments based on that subjective criticism? You won't mind having everyone here apply their standards of groupthink and emotionalism to your arguments?

It's a fine principle but the implementation gets really messy. Your calm, rational, well-reasoned arguments can easily sound like emotional groupthink to me and others, especially anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Just another means to squelch debate in the end. "If you stopped to think about that calmly, you wouldn't believe/say that!"

We have heard that a lot on the thread this year.



To: Lane3 who wrote (71944)6/13/2008 10:16:38 AM
From: KonKilo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542812
 
"Livid" was your word.

No, it wasn't. I used the word "rancor" to describe the public mood, but never used "livid".

If that was your impression, no wonder you advised cooling it.

No, I believe justice should be administered dispassionately.