To: skinowski who wrote (949 ) 6/14/2008 11:08:32 PM From: AllansAlias Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3209 Off to the eastern edge of North America tomorrow morning for a week of holidays. Hope everyone has a safe and prosperous week. In reviewing things today, I can see some continued s-t strength early next week to work off the obviously oversold condition in the smaller timeframes, but I am convinced that, in the end, the March lows will be tested and, on many charts, will not hold. I will stick with my short stop of SPX 1376, per the June 11 post. I think the trend is still down from this past Autumn. With any significant up move next week (i.e., rise of >3%), some important charts will be very difficult to read, from an Elliott point of view. Many of them will just read like jello on the dailies -- no clear down or up count. Still, I look back at the rise out of the Jan/Mar lows and I see what looks to me like distribution. The breadth is not good at all for such a rise. While sentiment is mixed, the moving averages of hard indicators, such as the $VIX and $CPC do not strike me as "worried", given how many charts have fallen more than 50% off the May highs. On the TA-side, if we continue to bounce, I would suggest that one follows the back-tests of the broken up-channels, vis a vis the rises out of the Jan/Mar lows. It would be a very bullish development if price were to rise back into these channels. As regards these broken up-channels, there are too many charts to list, but they include all the index charts (Dow, SPX, Nasdaq, mid-caps, ...). For example, we saw Friday the mid-caps back-testing the up-channel from its Mar low -- the up-channel it broke down out of earlier this past week. From an Elliott pov, basis daily, we see a number of charts with potential impulsive counts to the downside. Many of them sport a down-up-down right now, which could mean they were just corrections and we head higher. In order to maintain a strong down count, any rise should not violate the low of the first down, of such down-up-down charts. In Elliott terms, in a 5-wave down move, we should not see a putative 4th wave up violate the low of the putative 1st wave down. $TRAN is an example of this: from the high on June 5, we see that down-up-down look. Any rise here should not go up past 5249 or it is a warning to the bears. Cheers