Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (391355)	6/16/2008 1:56:56 AM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576816

See that bump right after the Permian? During that time about 99% of existing species died out. What of it - you're implication is co2? The point that seems to have eluded you is the temps and co2 levels are not linked and have both wandered all over the map (so to speak) over the planets life without our help. We are supposedly due for the next ice age and if higher co2 avoids or delays that I'm all for it - rather be too warm than too cool.

To: combjelly who wrote (391355)	6/16/2008 8:57:24 AM
From: Taro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576816

See that bump right after the Permian? During that time about 99% of existing species died out. Which should lead to the subconscious conclusion that they succumbed to CO2 poisoning or got toasted - or both. Right?? Taro