SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: one_less who wrote (72715)6/17/2008 4:04:56 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 542155
 
Something like this working profitably on an industrial scale (rather then just at great expense in a lab) would certainly be a positive development. But its a big step to go from one barrel a week to millions per day, and the odds are long for any particular process to make that leap.

I suspect that eventually something will, the only question is how long will it take, and related to that how big of factor will it be by that time. If it takes 80 years, and it turns out that by that time we have already largely moved away from oil, than it won't be nearly as big of factor as if it was ready in 10.



To: one_less who wrote (72715)6/17/2008 4:10:31 PM
From: biotech_bull  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 542155
 
The company claims that this “Oil 2.0” will not only be renewable but also carbon negative – meaning that the carbon it emits will be less than that sucked from the atmosphere by the raw materials from which it is made.

Amazing possibilty, if it's truly feasible.
When something sounds too good to be true, there might be downsides like carcinogenesis and other adverse effects