SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (254878)6/18/2008 1:52:17 PM
From: DMaA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793809
 
Yea, like that will stop 'em.

Good morning. I want....High oil prices. Oil...companies...rejected virtually every proposal... to bring enormous benefits to the American people. They...slipped in... $4-a-gallon gasoline. That is....not enough.

Thank you for your..$s.



To: KLP who wrote (254878)6/18/2008 4:19:13 PM
From: JDN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793809
 
This is a sensible approach that recognizes there will be no MAGIC BULLET to solve the energy crisis over the next 20 years or so. I'm sure it will happen some day but in the meanwhile President Bush's approach is the only one that makes sense. (although I am not convinced we ever will be able to tap into the oil shale deposits due to lack of water). However I noticed the Democrats have ALREADY completely ignored the PRACTICAL aspects of his plan and are talking of GEE WHIZ technology that DOESNT EXIST TODAY. Anyone who feels the Dems and their liberal cohorts arent SOLELY responsible for oi prices believes in the tooth fairy. Next will come OIL SHORTAGES and I hope THEN hunting licenses will be granted to BAG THESE FOOLS. jdn