Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: looking&searching who wrote (1957)	6/19/2008 12:35:11 PM
From: BarclayDonaldson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2396

looking: Seems like nothing has changed ... the company focus is still the same as it was four years ago: build something utilizing LACC that will service several large customers and generate tens to hundreds of millions of $$$ in revenues. The only change I can read into this is that Marc was recently pitching Americhip as a "technology" company where as now they seem focused on only LACC. Does this mean Alvin Snaper is completely out of the picture, contributing nothing than his name for a PR?!?!?

To: looking&searching who wrote (1957)	6/19/2008 1:11:54 PM
From: wso2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2396

looking&searching, that's the way I see it. Since the management shakeup two PR's announcing LACC production have been announced. Now this PR talking directly to shareholders and the investment community about transparency and LACC as the priority. Now would be a great time to have news on a couple more PO with major clients, that's for sure. What I'm really hoping is that this PR means NO MORE DILUTION, handing out shares to god knows who for god knows what! That's what this PR means for me going forward. Ofcourse this theory will blow up if O/S follows the same course as before. Question is, How Real is the Significance of the Eaton order. Management needs to walk the walk and report progress on the four (on my count) LACC PR's announcing production for GM per 4/24; mining company; camshaft PR, axel PR and ofcourse Eaton. One huge question I would ask if I got to attend the shareholders meeting is: has LACC ever once not succeeded in meeting specs on any validation process with any of the 29(?) parts for however many clients in PPAP, Run at Rate, or any other type of validation step we don't know about.