Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (31402)	6/19/2008 2:53:05 PM
From: DizzyG	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

Wrong again, Kenneth... The DNC has put out this canard of "8,000 leases and 68 million acres" as if all 68 million acres are oozing with oil and the oil companies are simply being greedy. Here are the real facts: When federal land or waters are leased to oil companies in parcels of about 1,000 to 3,000 acres, usually for 10 years, there is typically just “a very general sense of the value of the land,” said Larry Nation, a spokesman for the American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Only some portions of leased land may hold accessible oil, while other portions do not, Nation said, but companies must continue to lease the entire parcel. “There’s the misconception that every lease has oil,” added David Curtiss, director of the association’s Washington office. “A lease is a line on a map. It has nothing to do with the geology of where oil is.” Young, meanwhile, called it “most ironic” that Markey, Hinchey and Emanuel were “even attempting to talk about increasing America’s energy production.” “That they are attempting to make it appear as if they are for domestic energy production is baffling to me,” Young said. “Barely one month ago, Mr. Markey and Mr. Hinchey voted against my provision to open [the Arctic Refuge] for production.” cq.com@allnews&metapub=CQ-NEWS&binderName=cq-today-binder&seqNum=3 You are simply spouting the party line. You are wrong again. Diz-

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (31402)	6/19/2008 3:23:38 PM
From: tonto	Respond to of 224749

Kenneth, I know that you only parrot the DNC so you are not aware of the problems associated with drilling. They just can't start because of people like you who try to stop them. Exploration & Production Technologies Environmental Solutions - Federal Land Access -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Description Much (68%) of the remaining domestic oil and gas resource is on Federal Lands, primarily in the Western United States. Exploring and developing these resources depend on improving access. Access covers a variety of issues, from obtaining leases and permits to protecting environmental and cultural resources. The general public wants an uninterrupted supply of natural gas and oil at affordable prices; yet a sizable segment of society remains opposed to development of any kind, especially in environmentally sensitive locations. The public is generally unaware of recent technology advances that have significantly reduced drilling footprints and require fewer wells to be drilled to produce the same amount of petroleum. Today, producers can drill a single well from the surface, then turn the well underground to reach an oil or gas production zone miles away from the drill site. They can drill lateral wells extending like spokes from a wheel in a single wellbore to reach discrete oil and gas production zones without disturbing surface ecosystems. Because of technological advances, today it takes 22,000 fewer wells annually to develop the same amount of oil and gas reserves as it did in 1985. Where oil and gas operations are underway, new technologies have dramatically cut emissions of air pollutants and greenhouse gases, practically eliminated spills from offshore platforms, reduced the risks of blowouts, and provided better protection of groundwater resources. Environmental concerns related to federal lands access are among the most pressing issues limiting U.S. oil and natural gas production. NETL’s Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Program is working with regulators, industry, and academia to ensure that America can economically produce its oil and gas resources and protect the environment. Challenges Access problems identified by DOE and the Bureau of Land Management and through public comment include concerns that restrictions and leasing stimulations are complicated and may be inconsistent from region to region. These restrictions may be arbitrary and can increase costs and delay development activity. Some of the specific leasing concerns that cause difficulty for oil and gas development include areas that are closed or restricted; areas where mineral rights can be leased, but the land surface can’t be occupied; split estates where the mineral rights are owned by the state or federal government, but the surface land is privately owned; areas where access to the lease site is restricted (road issues); and roadless areas. Seasonal limitations on drilling activities due to environmental concerns include restrictions based on breeding/winter habitat of wildlife and the distance from streams or other restricted topographic features. Environmental concerns include protection of some 1,265 endangered species in the U.S. Status DOE’s response to the challenges in Federal lands access has been to promote cooperation with other Federal agencies, joint participation in management and regulatory analysis, and funding of research projects. The first joint BLM-DOE Research projects began in 2000. Ten projects tackled environmental problems in Colorado, Wyoming, Montana, New Mexico, Alaska, and Oklahoma. The projects were managed by regional BLM offices, and much of the scientific data collection and analysis was performed by university research teams in these states. BLM is using results from the research projects to provide accurate, science-based data to assess suggested changes in leasing stipulations. DOE also has agreements with several non-profit organizations to respond to the environmental needs associated with domestic energy resources. Joint efforts with the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission, the Ground Water Protection Council, and the Petroleum Environmental Research Forum provide research and coordination between several states and the Federal government. New projects include analysis to codify oil and gas field practices and resolving environmental barriers to oil and gas production on Federal lands. Impacts Many of the environmental protection standards related to oil and gas leasing were established without the benefit of detailed studies. Environmental scientists and biologists relied on their professional judgment to set the standards. In the absence of data, the standards were set conservatively to ensure protection. DOE has sponsored independent, scientific research that may be beneficial in defining these leasing regulations. Recent and proposed studies will ensure that potential for oil and gas development can be assessed appropriately relative to its impact on land access. Sound science will assist in determining the practical implementation of stipulations and in consideration of exceptions, waivers, and modifications. Changes in the technological capability of the drilling operators, such as pad drilling and smaller-footprint approaches, will be factored into assessing the environmental impacts of oil and gas development. DOE funds research projects that promote development of oil and gas resources on Federal lands while protecting the environment. These projects concentrate on acquisition of data and technologies to determine the impacts of oil and gas development activities, formulate strategies to protect wildlife and habitats, develop best practices, gather scientific data to assess environmental impacts, and collect data to evaluate the effectiveness of lease restrictions. This research will provide tools and information to support responsible environmental and resource development decisions that will allow the Nation to benefit from both its mineral and environmental resources. Funding sound scientific research on environmental issues and development practices will help to ensure a reliable, affordable supply of energy for America. The benefits for the U.S. public from the Oil and Natural Gas Environmental Program are a more competitive, economically viable U.S. energy industry that can supply an adequate amount of energy while simultaneously reducing environmental risks associated with oil and gas production and processing. Lower costs and improved environmental protection technologies will result in more of America’s oil and gas being produced and lead to a better quality of life for Americans. USA.GOV \| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY \| DOE OFFICE OF FOSSIL ENERGY DOE OFFICE OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY & RENEWABLE ENERGY \| OFFICE OF ELECTRICITY DELIVERY & ENERGY RELIABILITY Disclaimer \| Privacy Policy \| Web Policies \| FOIA/Privacy Act \| Employees Only

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (31402)	6/19/2008 3:54:30 PM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224749

Congress Cannot Deflect The Blame ibdeditorials.com So when Pelosi and other congressional Democrats claim the oilmen are "sitting" on all that land, under which lies an ocean of crude they are gleefully keeping from consumers, those senators and representatives are lying through their well-sharpened political teeth. Since Congress' enviro-driven 1982 moratorium, lease purchases have dwindled to a fraction of their previous level (see chart). Who, after all, wants permission to drill in a dry hole? This incompetent, irresponsible and thoroughly politicized Democratic Congress is endangering our national security and economic well-being by locking up our own energy resources. It must not be allowed to blame the companies that spend billions supplying our energy needs for its own idiotic policies.