SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: wso2 who wrote (1969)6/20/2008 2:46:03 PM
From: phoenixrising1  Respond to of 2396
 
wso2, the PR on orders is always good news. But I would still advise caution before putting faith in management. Let's keep in mind the kind of tactics Marc has used in the past. He has tried several times to kill any share holder meeting. If it is held, he could open and close the meeting at the same time. He could authorize millions of more shares to himself and his cronies to assure he wins any votes. After all, this is the same person who allegedly used an improper proxy to retake control, but never registered the action. Ask why he didn't. That's why the Nevada court is involved in trying to decide who really has control. After all, Ed, Tom and the others, removed Marc for alleged "gross mismanagement" and not acting in a manner, or not conducting business in a manner, consistent with share holder interests. And as an aside, nor am I necessarily convinced Ed should automatically be put ion charge either. I hope someone considers having the court appoint a Supervisor to over see any meeting that may take place to ensure all issues are addressed in a fair manner and without manipulation by "management". Ultimately I am in full agreement with you that focus should be on bringing in new orders, successfully executing on current contracts, and achieving profitability. The question we all have to answer is this, 'Is this really the correct team to make that happen and to ensure share holder value?'