Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (393020)	6/20/2008 2:00:19 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578718

>>> Obama will have to convince me that he is more moderate than you think Michael At this point, where do you think Obama is on the political spectrum? That he voted against Roberts is, to me, a very big deal because one simply cannot cast such a vote without being either stubbornly partisan or extreme. Roberts is, without the slightest doubt, the most qualified candidate for the Court to be nominated in my lifetime. Yet, Obama found an "out" for voting against him. This, to me, says one thing: Obama believes Court appointees should be be rejected based on ideology alone, which is an extreme liberal position anyway you slice it. There are, of course, many other instances of his extremism, but none more important. Nobody who understands the Constitution (which Obama clearly does) AND chooses to live by it (a different matter) believes that a nominee should be rejected on the basis of ideology. The vote against Roberts was Obama shouting at the top of his lungs, "I understand the Constitution doesn't intend for me do it, but I'm voting against this man on the basis of my ideology difference with him". I don't know what could be a better example of extremism.