Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (119612)	6/22/2008 12:09:30 AM
From: AuBug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312648

I'd be thrilled if GXS.v can get higher prices but I'm just quoting their PR: "Overall, the initial proximate analyses for the 22.6 metres of continuous coal in each hole show a range of Calorific Values (dry basis) of 18,900 to 23,150 Kj/Kg (8,100 to 10,000 BTU/lb) with an average of approximately 21,000 Kj/Kg (9,200 BTU/lb)." goldsourcemines.com Regardless the tonnage is so large should race over $100 with additional drill data. Someone already pointed out an historic hole 70 km away. I realized that in my table I forgot to subtract the Measured from the Indicted and the Measured+Indicated from the Inferred. Here's the corrected table: Radius (m) Volume (m3) Tonnes $ market $/t Mr Market Measured 600 70,036,798 92,841,204 $1,619,017,359 $3.38 Indicated 1200 121,156,793 160,606,180 $2,800,741,295 $1.95 Inferred 3600 1,135,900,726 1,505,756,887 $26,258,239,254 $0.21 1,759,204,270 $30,677,997,908