SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Longer-Term Market Trends -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: skinowski who wrote (1019)6/22/2008 11:11:40 AM
From: AllansAlias  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3209
 
Now, you know I looked at that stuff. -g/ng The first two examples confirmed a bad final move (sellable) at a major top. The rise into May had bad breadth, as I pointed out a few times. The problem here, is that we are not at a top or a bottom, but in a decline, significant only in a relatively small percentage of stocks. Dow is leading, but the further one gets into any measure that includes a broader range of stocks, especially tech or mid/small caps, there is little participation -- in terms of measures like A/D or NH/NL, as well as just how close they still are to the May highs. Hell, 3 decent up days in tech, mid-caps, and small-caps, and those charts are at new highs vis a vis May.

If, for the sake of argument, the Dow and, say, $OEX, made a new low vis a vis the March low, sometime soon, but the others maintained their relative strength... then I would have to say it is a buyable low based on the poor internals.

Unless tech takes out the June 12 low, which held (barely) this past week, and then tech starts to get sold harder than non-tech, then I am thinking this is a fake-out and we head back up for a few weeks/months. I remain short, but more worried than anytime in the last weeks...



To: skinowski who wrote (1019)6/22/2008 11:29:44 AM
From: AllansAlias  Respond to of 3209
 
I don't like to post "could be" scenarios here, because, hell, one can make a case for 10 "could be" setups before the price action confirms it as a high percentage "could be", but...

I post this one because it is so evil. This would catch a lot of people wrong-footed: