SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : ACII - AmeriChip International, Inc -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: nwest who wrote (1977)6/22/2008 9:46:33 PM
From: wso2  Respond to of 2396
 
exactly nwest, that's why this character slapshot is shopping around some blatant lies that no one but Rutkowski knows how to apply LACC for production, and apparently doesn't have the common sense to even notice.
I am long on Americhip and am guilty myself of wishful thinking that everything is going well, based on PR's released in '08.
Slapshot on the other hand, sounds like some one who is short and his wishful thinking is that everything is collapsing. LOL
oh well, the longs vs. the shorts.
The good news is that July release on 10Q and the conclusion of Eaton PPAP (which according to the tone of most recent PR, should be promptly updated, in the new spirit of transparency and shareholder value)
are drawing closer could be pivotal.



To: nwest who wrote (1977)6/24/2008 11:56:08 AM
From: Slapshot99  Respond to of 2396
 
According to the recent letter to the shareholders, Marc Walther states that a “demonstratable” of the oil pipe technology is being built at Americhip that is a “self contained machine” which “will be available by mid 2008”. (Not should, not might, but will be available by mid 2008 – which is right about now.) Well, if Americhip doesn’t need Rutkowski, then they surely must be able to show us the demonstratable! (Or at least give us an update on the status of this important project.) I mean they wouldn’t be stupid enough to get rid of Mr. Rutkowski before having completed that would they?

According to your conversation with Rhonda, she says "there are people that can move this process forward". Great! Who are those "people"? The founder of LACC has been removed. IMHO, asking who is heading up the technology now is a very legitimate and important question for shareholders to know. It's why we invested in the first place, isn't it?