SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (393490)6/23/2008 1:59:31 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1577883
 
The Bakken will help. I think the news has been hyped there. I think and hope over time that the industry will gain experience and expertise in how to exploit the Bakken and it will develop into a big important field.

However, even if it does, there's no reason we should spurn developing other reserves.

Look, the oil industry has gotten a lot better at producing offshore since 1969 when the leasing ban began. The offshore drilling industry only got started since WWII. Even in the Santa Barbara channel, drilling and production has continued to today on the leases that had been granted prior to 1969 - and there h/b no more problems there. Also, consider nations like Norway, the UK and Canada - they have major offshore oil production in some of the challenging offshore environments on earth which are also important fisheries (the North Sea, Canadian arctic, and offshore Nova Scotia) and have had for decades. Why should we forego what they are doing?

These are nations that you liberal folks hold up as examples for the US. But when it comes to offshore drilling you say we should be more backward than they are.



To: tejek who wrote (393490)6/23/2008 2:00:08 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
The Bakken will help. I think the news has been hyped there. I think and hope over time that the industry will gain experience and expertise in how to exploit the Bakken and it will develop into a big important field.

However, even if it does, there's no reason we should spurn developing other reserves.

Look, the oil industry has gotten a lot better at producing offshore since 1969 when the leasing ban began. The offshore drilling industry only got started since WWII. Even in the Santa Barbara channel, drilling and production has continued to today on the leases that had been granted prior to 1969 - and there h/b no more problems there. Also, consider nations like Norway, the UK and Canada - they have major offshore oil production in some of the challenging offshore environments on earth which are also important fisheries (the North Sea, Canadian arctic, and offshore Nova Scotia) and have had for decades. Why should we forego what they are doing?

These are nations that you liberal folks hold up as examples for the US. But when it comes to offshore drilling you say we should be more backward than they are.