SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (393506)6/23/2008 2:22:43 PM
From: i-node  Respond to of 1577883
 
There is no doubt about this -- we will be using petroleum from now on.

However, it is well within reach to think that we will cut back on our demand in the next 10 years sufficiently to approach independence if we use what we have.

A small (25%) decline in our usage is sufficient to moderate oil prices and to cause OPEC to recognize that their ability to control the world economy is coming to an end. This is readily achievable through alternative fuels, hyrbrid technologies, electric vehicles and other evolving changes in this area.

It is true we cannot drill our way out of it, but at the same time, drilling is a part of the solution.

Of the two, McCain to date is much stronger on energy policy. But the message is lost in a sea of other ideological differences. For example, JF on this thread has been most vocal about energy issues, yet he obviously misses McCain's much stronger energy stance. I have no doubt this is happening millions of times over as the Left is under the influence of Obama's cult.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (393506)6/23/2008 3:56:48 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1577883
 
It isn't "thinking outside the box" to think we won't need oil in 7-10 years, even 20-25 years. Its just stupid. We'll be burning gasoline, diesel fuel, etc for our lifetimes.

I can understand how you would feel that way since you work for an oil company.