Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Uranium Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (13625)	6/29/2008 8:07:18 AM
From: james flannigan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 30199

Regardless of your limited understanding in how to value a company,the 35% increase in GEM shares this week speak to your charges of pumping as the market is correcting the valuation.I would suggest that you practice what you preach SI Spam and avoid subject companies you know nothing about. Some investors have no clue how to value a companies assets and tend to trash the ones that do,all while hiding under the boards "good cop" SI Spam Cop You have attacked my GEM stock pick,yet you offer no valuation to this board of your own,all while trying to sound intelligent as the good cop of SI You don't have to agree with my value of GEM.But charges of pumping should be backed with your valuation facts.But I forgot you don't know how to value a company it seems.So instead you try to fool the readers into thinking you are protecting them. A few will fall for your agenda, but I think most on this board are smarter than that. I suspect the rising stock price of GEM will make you more hostile in the future.Some times a rising stock price can bring out the worst in some, James