SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (120735)6/27/2008 12:39:10 AM
From: hank2010  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312525
 
Thanks, RE. I agree with all 7 points. I think from what I have heard so far, (mainly on this board and from Geoshares) is that they are under-estimating quantity and over-estimating price. They can have best coal in Sask. and still not be good enough for coking. I was always told you need +12,500 BTU for coking, very low sulphur, enough volatiles to make coke but not too high to lose too much combustibles. I think it is too early to say they have coking coal.



To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (120735)6/27/2008 12:58:53 AM
From: Michael Mc Donough  Respond to of 312525
 
One thing to add from the agm. They will be reporting the visual thickness and appearance on a hole by hole basis.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News