To: Brumar89 who wrote (394574 ) 6/27/2008 2:49:36 PM From: tejek Respond to of 1576318 A New Reality for GM, and Its Shareholders By Jim Cramer RealMoney.com Columnist 6/27/2008 12:18 PM EDT Is my analysis of GM extreme? Yes. Do I want GM to file bankruptcy? No. Is it the most rational thing for them to do? Yes. The problems with GM are so myriad that it is difficult for the company to solve things without some sort of wholesale breakage with the past. I believe that GM has made remarkable strides to bring down costs per car and truck, but the problem now is that it has the wrong cars and trucks because of gasoline's rising costs. Until that happened and the unions held them up, I thought that GM was making the turn. Now the issue is not the prospects for the common shares, it is the prospects for the company; and the company should not be compromised by the common. It is possible that the common can be diluted down to some single-digit number, but why the heck should it even exist? Why don't the bondholders get the company? There's not just the cars and trucks. We have no transparency when it comes to GMAC, which I regarded as perhaps among the worst lender when it came to residential mortgages. How do I know that? Did you ever see GMAC's ads? They were more aggressive than even Countrywide (CFC - commentary - Cramer's Take), although less aggressive than New Century (NCBC - commentary - Cramer's Take), Ameriquest, Fremont and Novastar -- the ones that may have been scammed left and right. GMAC, like Chrysler, is a black box because Cerebrus doesn't have to tell us jack. This is why they can always tell us that they are in great shape. I look at GM like I look at the American steel industry. No one ever thought, for example, that Bethlehem Steel would ever have to reorganize. That was the richest company in America by the way it paid its executives in the 1960s. In the 1990s it had some big years. It was a gigantic company and the biggest maker of all sorts of steel. read more........thestreet.com