SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (130980)6/27/2008 1:21:28 PM
From: Think4YourselfRespond to of 306849
 
I am just happy for each day. I am healthy. I have adequate food from all over the world. Good medical care is nearby. I can travel anywhere in the world that I want. My cave is comfortable. Financial security is reasonable. Most importantly , I have an intelligent caring partner.

For me, life can't get any better. To me, these are the things that are important in life. People complain about their standard of living. The poor in this country live better than the emperors of Rome did. They aren't pooping in pots, have clean running water in their abodes (HOT even!), have refrigerators, light on command, possibly air conditioning, the list is endless.



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (130980)6/27/2008 1:54:52 PM
From: ChanceIsRespond to of 306849
 
Oil in Beverly Hills `Humming' Where Britney Spears Is Shopping

By Michael Janofsky and Samantha Zee
More Photos/Details

June 27 (Bloomberg) -- Britney Spears, Jay Z, Adam Sandler and Plains Exploration and Production Co. have one thing in common. They've all been sighted at Beverly Center, an eight- level mall near Beverly Hills, where celebrities shop for clothes and the oil company pumps crude.

The rising price of oil, which hit a record $140 a barrel yesterday, has sent exploration companies scurrying to squeeze additional supplies from the fields underlying Los Angeles and its celebrity-rich neighbor.

California, the fourth-biggest U.S. producer of crude, behind Louisiana, Texas and Alaska, has received 16 percent more notices from owners planning to rework old wells this year, while plans to drill new ones are up 23 percent from 12 months ago, according to state Department of Conservation data.

``In the Middle East you might have 300 barrels of oil per cubic acre, but in the Los Angeles Basin you might have 4,000 barrels per cubic acre,'' says Mike Edwards, vice president of Denver-based Venoco Inc., which has 24 active wells in the Beverly Hills area, including one alongside Beverly Hills High School. ``In terms of the land that produces oil, the basin is very rich.''

Beverly Center's kidney-bean shape was designed to accommodate drilling. It's one of two sites within blocks of Beverly Hills, a city of about 35,000 where Houston-based Plains, the fourth-biggest producer in California, is expanding. The 26-year-old mall houses 160 retailers, including Gucci, Louis Vuitton and Burberry. Pumping operations are hidden behind a wall between Macy's and Bloomingdale's.

`Weird Things'

``This is one of those weird things about Los Angeles,'' says Jeff Brown, the mall's general manager. ``There are oil wells all over the place. Drive down the street, you see hotel, beautiful house, oil well. Here, I don't know if shoppers know there's one or not. They probably don't.''

California has been producing oil commercially since 1874, most of it from Kern County in the San Joaquin Basin around Bakersfield, a city 110 miles (177 kilometers) northwest of Los Angeles.

The state pumped 243.2 million barrels from onshore and offshore sources last year, a 2.3 decline from 2006, according to the annual production report. Los Angeles County, the most populous in the U.S. with 9.9 million people, had 3,400 of California's 50,856 wells in operation last year.

Production decreased in recent years as reserves and exploration fell. The rate of decline is slowing because rising prices are now encouraging companies to drill new wells and return to old ones, said Hal Bopp, the state oil and gas supervisor.

`Stay Flat'

Production is forecast to ``to stay flat'' in 2008, he said. ``Like everywhere else in the world, there's a lot of increased activity here. As the price of oil rises, it's more economical to produce.''

California has 3 billion recoverable barrels, according to the conservation department. That's equivalent to 4 percent of North American proved oil reserves as measured by BP Plc's Statistical Review of World Energy 2008.

Almost 8 percent of the state's onshore output in 2007 came from the Los Angeles Basin, which Bopp described as the most- densely populated oil-producing region of the world.

About 30,000 wells have been drilled since oil production began in the Los Angeles basin more than 130 years ago, producing 8.6 billion barrels from active wells, according to the department.

The 1,200-acre Beverly Hills field is part of the basin, last year producing almost 1 million barrels from 97 wells, the department said. Wells pay royalties of about one-eighth of revenue to property owners including cities, local businesses and householders, Bopp said.

Cancer Suit

One production site has drawn a civil suit by 12 former students at Beverly Hills High who claim crude pumped from under athletic fields caused breast and thyroid cancers, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and testicular and skin cancers.

The five defendants include Chevron Corp., the state's leading producer, and Venoco, ranked 13th. Oil companies have been pumping at the school since 1959. Venoco, the site's current owner, produces about 400 barrels a day from 15 wells, Edwards said.

A lower court dismissed the case in 2006, citing a lack of evidence to link the illnesses to operations at the school. The plaintiffs appealed.

A ruling on whether the evidence is credible may come next year, said Kevin McHargue, a lawyer with Baron & Budd of Dallas who represents the plaintiffs. A decision in the former students' favor would allow a trial to begin, he said.

Hidden Crude

Like the oil derrick at the high school, now obscured by a 175-foot tower decorated with colorful tiles, other production sites in the Beverly Hills field are hidden from view.

Several miles from Beverly Center, at the foot of a street of million-dollar homes, a six-story, windowless structure houses a Plains well.

``It's not the most lovely thing you have ever seen,'' says Gene Cooper, a sculptor in who lives several houses away.

Noise from the well site increased this year as oil prices rose, he said. ``When it started humming 24 hours a day, the neighbors complained. There is a low hum always.''

The only hint of production at Los Angeles's Rancho Park municipal golf course is noise coming from a row of shrubs along the fourth fairway.

``The oil well here is out of the way, there are no homes nearby and they've made an effort to hide it,'' said Andy Dierken, a golfer in the midst of a game with three cigar- chomping friends. ``It doesn't smell, and from the green, you can't hear it.''

In addition, he said as the foursome drove off in their carts, ``we need the oil.''

The case is Lori Lynn Moss et al v. Venoco Inc. et al, BC297083, Los Angeles County Superior Court.



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (130980)6/27/2008 2:07:38 PM
From: neolibRespond to of 306849
 
I never here a peep about that from the Greens

IIRC, it has long been an issue pushed by Greens. In fact, various ecologists point this out now and again, and get shouted down. (I'm thinking of some prof back in one of the Colo U's who created quite the firestorm by pointing this out in the last year or two). Plenty like him. The fundamental issue wrt to population is that most economists think increases are great, because almost all economic theories are predicated on growth, or more accurately, pyramid schemes. How many economic frameworks do you know about predicated on steady-state, or even declining systems? It is taboo. Search around a bit, and you'll find plenty of op-ed pieces by rightwing types gloating over the USA's population increase compared to the likes of Japan, Russia, much of Europe, and even bashing China's one-child policy (although said same individuals might well wring there hands about the ethnicity of our growth, LOL!). IIRC, Micheal Baronne (Sp??) once had a classic in US News, where in the same article he bashed China's one-child policy for depriving them of the economic growth of some 300-400 million additional individuals (don't ask for how he estimated this effect) while a few paragraphs away, he bashed them for having 300 million underemployed in the countryside. How that disconnect made it past the editors caused me much amusement.


Put another way, if we had acted sooner to develop alternatives, we'd still have the luxury of holding back ANWR and the OCS. I believe we've forfeited those options by sleepwalking too long.


I agree, we are late waking up, but as I point out, we are far from awake on the issue yet. The thing is, I've lived through very strick gas rationing, in the late 1970's in Rhodesia, where we had 9 gallons of gas per month, and this was better than average because we lived 30 miles from town. We got by. There has been very little change of habits here in the USA at $4/gal, which surprises me. Perhaps it will take $7-10 or more. I know I could easily wack my gas consumption in half, and I suspect, with some care, I could hit 25%. Even the transportation sector could do much better. I see empty semi's or partial loads going down the freeway all the time. A lot of what is going by on semi's could be going most the way on rail if the damn railways were a tad more on the ball and a little less unionized. Reading the IRS tax code and seeing all the crap about railroads will explain a bit of that problem.



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (130980)6/28/2008 12:02:37 PM
From: YogizunaRespond to of 306849
 
You are correct. Twenty or thirty years ago, we would hear much more about overpopulation, and all of the future problems it would cause for the world. Now we hardly here a peep, as they have seemingly given up trying to convince people about the urgency of the problem. It's sad.



To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (130980)6/28/2008 12:20:13 PM
From: Jim McMannisRespond to of 306849
 
At best new drilling is the stop gap we need to get to alternative. Drill yes but develop alternative at the same time. Otherwise the economy suffers big time until alternatives get built.