SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (255958)6/27/2008 8:37:27 PM
From: Sea Otter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793707
 
Ok, got it. They're all cowards and liars. I just wanted to make sure.

And, actually Steve, the debate within the scientific community is intense. The IPCC had to laboriously go through and address every one of the counter-arguments and counter-evidence, point by point. If you read the report and associated documents, you would see this.

And no, actually he published in some technical Agronomist journal, I believe. It sounded a little beyond an otter. I could try to dig up the link if you're interested (but somehow I imagine you won't be).



To: steve harris who wrote (255958)6/27/2008 8:47:59 PM
From: alanrs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793707
 
Are the Stanford faculty all liars?

Probably not, but they could all be stupid. Or wrong.

ARS



To: steve harris who wrote (255958)6/28/2008 3:55:14 AM
From: Elroy  Respond to of 793707
 
Man cannot accurately predict weather days in advance

I can. In the UAE it is going to be damn hot tomorrow. The day after that is going be hella hot as well. And the next day, no snow, because it's just gonna be hot.....

weather.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News