Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (131125)	6/28/2008 12:20:28 PM
From: Think4Yourself	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

The bridge issue may be legit. We had a LNG tanker explode in the US many years ago. Anyone who thinks it's not a serious issue might want to look into that event. They are like atomic bombs. It's a sure thing that if a tanker hit a bridge and started leaking, everyone on or near the bridge would be instantly cremated. I am all for LNG, but those tankers really should offload a few miles from shore for safety, at underwater terminals designed specifically for that purpose. If they have to come inland it should only be allowed in unpopulated areas.