Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (256025)	6/28/2008 4:29:47 PM
From: miraje	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

I've got a better idea... Eliminate all mandates and subsidies. Get rid of the bureaucracies and their layers of rules and regulations that won't let you build a dog house, much less a nuke or refinery, without years and years of wading through red tape and spending vast amounts of $$'s before even getting started with actual construction (if permission is even eventually granted). Open the vast majority of offshore and onshore areas that are currently verboten to allow our energy companies, conventional and alternative, to develop the resources needed to keep our country and economy strong and healthy. Bottom line, get the government, in all of its manifestations, the hell out of the way before it's too late...

To: KLP who wrote (256025)	6/28/2008 8:21:00 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793840

Its four-year blueprint calls for the government to spend: • • $2 billion to pay half the cost for automakers to make 40 million cars flexible-fuel capable, meaning they can burn alcohol, gasoline or any combination of the two. It costs $100 per vehicle to do this. Why should the government pay for this. If is economically attractive $100 is nothing. • • $1 billion to place alcohol fuel pumps in at least a quarter of the nation's gas stations. What nonsense - we do not need mor alcohol fuel unless there is new technology to manufacture it. • • $2 billion in tax breaks for consumers who buy hybrid autos. If the cars are economically attractive $2 billion is not needed. • • $4 billion for loan guarantees to help automakers develop for the marketplace fuel-cell battery technology and plug-in hybrid vehicles. The coalition says a combination flex-fuel/plug-in hybrid electric car running on an 80 percent alcohol, 20 percent gasoline fuel could get up to 500 miles per gallon of gas. Since plug-ins can be recharged overnight when electricity use is down, current power plants could support up to 30 percent of U.S. cars being plug-in hybrids. Why loan guarantees? • • $3 billion for public-private cost-sharing projects to build 25 commercial-scale demonstration plants to make non oil-based liquid fuels. It notes America has hundreds of years in supplies of coal, and a Department of Energy project showed "clean coal" technology can produce methanol alcohol for less than 50 cents a gallon. $3 billion might buy one plant. This guys does not know what he is talking about!