Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (131226)	6/29/2008 9:03:13 AM
From: Pogeu Mahone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Q if you find it please post it. tia =============== Very disturbing that I cannot find the article. Am going to poke around some more. If I find it I will P-mail it to you.

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (131226)	6/29/2008 3:26:39 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 306849

Re: I read the article about 7 years ago, when LNG was starting back up in this country. I didn't mean to imply that transporting huge volumes of LNG can be done without incurring significant risks, just that, properly mitigated, they're often worth accepting. Concentrated energy is potentially dangerous, period, but it's also extremely beneficial . Overall, it's probably better to transport some LNG than burn the equivalent coal (or push people off the grid, at the margin). It's at least worthwhile to consider that what would be substituted for the LNG. Regards, Dan