SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: alanrs who wrote (131267)6/29/2008 5:33:07 PM
From: ChanceIsRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
>>>Bad things happen. Not possible to foresee every one, nor act to counter even the ones foreseen.<<<

Look. All I want to know is who was responsible for the 2005 hurricanes, the 2005 SE Asia tsunami, the 2008 typhoon at Mynamar, the 2008 earthquake in China, and the 2008 floods in the American mid-West.

Last I heard was that the US was being sued for the tsunami because we didn't have enough warning systems deployed around the world. If we had them for our own territories (e.g. Pearl Harbor) than we had a moral obligation to place a grid all around the world. I have the vaguest recollection that some group actually sued the American power industry for Katrina damages, being that it is the largest emitter of CO2 and therefore most responsible for global warming and the attendant hurricanes.

Lots of people go whacko. Probably genetic. Sometimes it even happens in droves - like the housing mania. Hard to write that off to DNA or nature.

I often wonder about our response to 9/11. We lost some 5K very precious lives that day. But we wipe out 50K on our highways every year and we don't declare war on anybody. I guess that its kind of hard for the Prez to explain to J6P that unlike our highway system, the human loss on 9/11 was just a normal expense in doing business. Compared to the natural disasters of the last few years, 9/11 is hardly worth mention.

But if you want to see famine, economic dislocation, and mini civil wars, just keep finding ridiculous reasons not to modernize the US energy infrastructure.



To: alanrs who wrote (131267)6/29/2008 5:52:39 PM
From: neolibRespond to of 306849
 
Actually, the dangers from a large LNG problem could be pretty easily determined. We have quite good computational fluid and thermodynamic codes, and a small experiment could be used to baseline things. As you say, it is a cost/benefit thingy. Sometimes people don't want to know what they don't want to know, especially if it takes a little work and $ to find out.