SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: carranza2 who wrote (104060)6/30/2008 6:07:12 AM
From: Condor  Respond to of 206325
 
Suncor CEO dismisses OBAMA 'rhetoric'
RICHARD BLACKWELL

U.S. proposals that could restrict imports from Canada's oil sands are "political rhetoric" that will fade after the presidential election is over, the head of one of Canada's biggest petroleum companies said yesterday.

Rick George, chief executive officer of Suncor Energy Inc., told The Globe and Mail that the U.S. election campaign is heating up a debate that likely won't last after one of the candidates takes power.

"I think we're in political rhetoric. ... These guys will say a lot of things, but then when they get into office, it'll end up they'll do something else," Mr. George said. "The pragmatic thing is, if they don't buy crude from Canada, where are they going to buy it?"

Earlier this week, Barack OBAMA, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, endorsed a "low carbon fuel standard" that could penalize gasoline marketers in the U.S. who rely on the oil sands. Several states were already considering such a standard.

Mr. George, who is participating in a campaign by oil sands producers to show they are committed to reducing environmental damage, said it will be difficult to get the group's message across in the United States during the presidential campaign. "There's a time for a discussion and a time when you're not going to get heard above the noise," he said.

Still, it is important for the industry to point out that there is very little difference between the emissions generated by the oil sands and that from other producers around the world, he insisted. "At the end of the day I think the Americans will be pragmatic. ... Do you want to buy from Nigeria or Iran or one of the other problem states, or do you want to buy it from your neighbour?"

And even if U.S. restrictions are put in place, Canadian producers will find other markets, Mr. George said. "The practical reality ... is that this crude oil will find a home. Crude oil is a worldwide commodity and there is a world price."

Canadian oil sands producers can develop the resource responsibly, he insisted. Suncor itself has reduced emissions, per unit of production, by 44 per cent since 1990, and its use of water is down 40 per cent over the last five years.

Still, when the increase in oil sands production is taken into account, Suncor's overall emissions have risen sharply and will continue to do so.

"There are no silver bullets" to stop this trend, Mr. George said, although the industry's move to invest in carbon capture and storage technologies will help over the long term.

Their vision is a large pipeline that will carry carbon dioxide from Fort McMurray, Alta., past Edmonton to central Alberta, where the gas will be pumped into deep underground reservoirs. But that is not likely to come to fruition for several years, and will be very costly.

In the meantime, a carbon tax makes some sense, Mr. George said, as long as it is applied across all sectors and to all forms of carbon emissions, including the consumption of fuel as well as its production.

Anything that looks like a "tax grab" from industry players just won't work, he said. "If this is another National Energy Program where you're shifting money from the West to the East, then I'll tell you that in the West it will not sell."

Suncor has also been investing in clean alternative energy, such as wind power and ethanol, but Mr. George said none of these individually has the potential to displace fossil fuels on a large scale. To deal with increasing demand, particularly from the fast-growing middle class in Asia, "you've got to pull on all levers here. You've got to pull on nuclear, you've got to pull on renewables, you've got to pull on sustainable oil development."

SUNCOR ENERGY (SU)

Close: $60.45, up 10cents

***

Petroleum imports

Top 15 countries with total imports year to date, in thousand barrels per day

Canada: 2,518

Saudi Arabia: 1,533

Mexico: 1,338

Venezuela: 1,158

Nigeria: 1,152

Iraq: 693

Algeria: 524

Angola: 478

Russia: 410

Virgin Islands: 338

Kuwait: 222

Ecuador: 213

Brazil: 206

U.K.: 199

Colombia: 192

Note: Exclude oil imports into the U.S. territories

KATHRYN TAM/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

SOURCE: ENERGY INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION

© 2008 The Globe and Mail



To: carranza2 who wrote (104060)6/30/2008 7:44:27 AM
From: james flannigan  Respond to of 206325
 
I do not think Canada would cut off crude oil to the US.But my main point was the likes of Chavez threatens to cut oil off to the US all the time.Canada has told Bush,relax Canada will pick up the slack if Chavez was dumb enough to do so.

Canada was the counter balance to Chavez in terms of energy security of any country that would threaten our great trading partner the US.

Obama and his attacks on Canadian energy is unloading his gun in front of Chavez and is putting the US in a weak position to have any power to counter Chavez.

Obama has shown he is not ready to be President,and is likely to isolate the US from its allies at the very time the middle east is at war and the worlds oil supply at great risk.

His stance on Canadian oil is at best one of the most dumbest statements he ever made, lets hope he is just trying to get the green vote.If not Americans may be walking on their future vacations.

James