SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hank2010 who wrote (121132)7/1/2008 12:00:57 AM
From: Rocket Red  Respond to of 312983
 
Yup pick the right horse for the win, place and show :))))



To: hank2010 who wrote (121132)7/1/2008 12:26:52 AM
From: Sailing2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 312983
 
Hank2010, My read of the map that was circulated is that WGF has a huge land position between GXS and WER. Is that your understanding as well? And if so, do you know if they successfully staked their property for coal permits?
Oilgeezer



To: hank2010 who wrote (121132)7/1/2008 8:54:34 AM
From: WalterWhite  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 312983
 
Hank - thanks for coal thoughts. I am playing 4 wild cards including GXS, WGF, WER, and KEX in that order of portfolio allocation.

Interesting all new claims seem to be west of the Goldsource claims. Coal could be in Manitoba as well but have heard nothing about new claims or activity there. That's where I would be looking for the coalseam in the ruff...lol.

Globe



To: hank2010 who wrote (121132)7/1/2008 12:07:23 PM
From: koan  Respond to of 312983
 
Hank: "Well, to each his own! I prefer a more diversified group of companies in this area."

koan: glad to hear you say that hank, as I have most of the usual suspects in a basket of coal plays. WGF, WER and SMI seem the top three. But I have most of them.

Bought some CCJ and PHC wts yesterday.

CSI wts sure look strong.