Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (395578)	7/2/2008 1:23:32 AM
From: TopCat	Respond to of 1573377

"If the explanation were weak, you could easily dissect it and win the debate. But you didn't, so you lost. Next." I wasn't trying to win a debate. Next.

To: Thomas M. who wrote (395578)	7/2/2008 11:03:02 AM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 1573377

Tom, > If the explanation were weak, you could easily dissect it and win the debate. But you didn't, so you lost. Does the obvious really need pointing out? Message 24723126 Seems like you can justify anything these days by telling the opposition, "Oh yeah? Well ... you voted for Bush twice!" You could even nominate Susan Sarandon, then avoid describing her "qualifications" with that excuse. Then declare victory and move on. The last rule of partisan politics. Tenchusatsu